A facility to reject or accept future updates
musket at 11h48
22
Mar
2009
Would you like to have a facility that explains an update and allows you either to reject or accept it?
as I feel a lot of updates are not wanted by some and they are happier the way things are or were.
as I feel a lot of updates are not wanted by some and they are happier the way things are or were.
1 ~Chris, on 22/03/2009 at 11h56
All of the updates (except for the avatars in the members list, which makes little difference to the forum), were optional this time around...
2 musket, on 22/03/2009 at 12h03
That was not an answer to the poll question~Chris wrote:All of the updates (except for the avatars in the members list, which makes little difference to the forum), were optional this time around...
3 ~Chris, on 22/03/2009 at 12h11
I know this..
4 musket, on 22/03/2009 at 12h15
Please make your vote in the poll and give reason in your message for your decision~Chris wrote:I know this..
5 ~Chris, on 22/03/2009 at 12h26
As you wish.
I vote no, because the majority of the updates are optional anyway.
Do have a good day.
I vote no, because the majority of the updates are optional anyway.
Do have a good day.
6 musket, on 22/03/2009 at 12h33
Please read the options as there is an I'm not bothered either way 'option'
7 Merlinz, on 22/03/2009 at 13h59
Well I chose no because a update is a update majority of the updates are optional anyway. and its forumotion choice if they want to update they service most people want regular updates and this will just delay the updates.
We already have a facility that explains a update and allows you either to reject or accept it the announcement and most features need to be activated.
We already have a facility that explains a update and allows you either to reject or accept it the announcement and most features need to be activated.
8 Tarogasini, on 22/03/2009 at 17h22
I voted yes. I think that would actually be good... Its the same with Microsoft Updates. Unless if you set it to NOTIFY you when its time for an update, they will simply download/install the updates while you didnt even want some of them.
9 Toddseahawks, on 22/03/2009 at 18h55
Im not voteing...as these are not mandatory updates and its misleading.
10 musket, on 25/02/2011 at 00h57
Well we got more updates
11 ToTheFuture, on 04/03/2011 at 17h56
And after these recent ones...? Yes. I would at least love the idea to delay an update at the minimum. 
EDIT:
You should re-submit this pol, since you have so many no's.
EDIT:
You should re-submit this pol, since you have so many no's.
Similar topics
Hi All,
Our OLTP system supports effective dated concept. So users can enter Future Dated Rows also. And in our Warehouse we have both Type1 Dimesnions and Type2 Dimensions.
When loading the data to Type1 dimesnions, if we load future dated row
Lot of people will pay attention to EPS AND P/E
However we can get many bull factors from quarterly reports and annual reports.
Once we read quarterly reports we can become bullish, bearish or extremely bullish.
We can become extremely bullish by
Hello, folks. I'd like to ask some newbie questions.
I'm starting a multidimensional model for facilities management from scratch, and I'll certainly need a SPACE dimension, since it's the grain in which all the spatial information is stored in the
Replies 1 to 11 on 11 for "A facility to reject or accept future updates"
Search
See also
Informations
11 Replies For the topic :
"A facility to reject or accept future updates"
This topic has been viewed 988 times.
Last message :
22/03/2009 at 11h48 by "musket"
