should mods have the right to edit members signature's
APE at 00h05
12
Mar
2011
Hi all just a little some thing i have looked over and found would be good to have on the site.
Right now the only way to edit a members signature is the member them self or a admin of the site with ACP rights.
i am asking you all to support me on having a place on the mods tools where the Mods can edit the signature's
this will help the staff when some one puts porn or some other thing in the signature that should not be there
This is a screen shot of a MCP that is on MyBB forum
as you can see you can stop the member from using the sig or just edit it
right now the admins are the only ones that can do this ..
come on guys lets get this added to the site.
Right now the only way to edit a members signature is the member them self or a admin of the site with ACP rights.
i am asking you all to support me on having a place on the mods tools where the Mods can edit the signature's
this will help the staff when some one puts porn or some other thing in the signature that should not be there
This is a screen shot of a MCP that is on MyBB forum
as you can see you can stop the member from using the sig or just edit it
right now the admins are the only ones that can do this ..
come on guys lets get this added to the site.
1 !_NICK_!, on 12/03/2011 at 03h49
Its okay, but not the best Ideal I Heard. The best one is the Proper Warning System.
2 Sanket, on 12/03/2011 at 04h59
Voted yes, i don't think it will hurt to have this.
3 Base, on 12/03/2011 at 12h28
I have voted yes. This idea seems reasonable and it would definitely be less hassle for the admins if moderators can do this. 
4 APE, on 12/03/2011 at 12h45
Thank you guys ....
keep the votes comming please
~Ape~
keep the votes comming please
~Ape~
5 APE, on 13/03/2011 at 22h35
bump 
6 !_NICK_!, on 17/03/2011 at 23h29
Bump
7 TakashiKinataka, on 17/03/2011 at 23h34
I voted Yes, with being an Admin to a forum myself, it's a hassle stopping what you're doing and going through the ACP to change a Member's signiture if it violates the rules. If mods were to do this, Admins could get done with what they need to get done faster and not have to deal with setbacks like these.
8 APE, on 18/03/2011 at 00h12
Thank you for your vote
9 middo2, on 23/03/2011 at 03h27
Yes please
10 invisible_fa, on 24/03/2011 at 00h53
Voted yes but I would modify a little detail...
It would be nice that Mods could turn off members signatures, but not edit them...
I will explain myself:
In that cases you spoke about (users wich uses signature to post porn images and so), it would be nice that Mods could turn off the users signature, I mean, desactivate that signature, but not edit it.
Because, if you say edit, you mean that Mods can enter into the user signature and modify the content...
I would like Mods could desactivate signatures, but not edit its content.
It would be nice that Mods could turn off members signatures, but not edit them...
I will explain myself:
In that cases you spoke about (users wich uses signature to post porn images and so), it would be nice that Mods could turn off the users signature, I mean, desactivate that signature, but not edit it.
Because, if you say edit, you mean that Mods can enter into the user signature and modify the content...
I would like Mods could desactivate signatures, but not edit its content.
11 kirk, on 24/03/2011 at 02h22
I would say yes,
But only if there is a real reason to.
like if it was to big or had a link in it you dint want in there and was not allowed on the forum.
Other then that signatures are supposed to be the members personal expression or something to share with every post, so you have to give them some flexibility to have something that fits them and shows their personality or things their interest..If you were to take that away, then my's well not even allow members to have them., so yes if there was realy something that had to be changed ,edited out, or Spammy, other then that there would be no reason to.
But only if there is a real reason to.
like if it was to big or had a link in it you dint want in there and was not allowed on the forum.
Other then that signatures are supposed to be the members personal expression or something to share with every post, so you have to give them some flexibility to have something that fits them and shows their personality or things their interest..If you were to take that away, then my's well not even allow members to have them., so yes if there was realy something that had to be changed ,edited out, or Spammy, other then that there would be no reason to.
12 Jalochee, on 28/03/2011 at 18h50
No please
13 APE, on 30/03/2011 at 16h47
invisible_fa wrote:Voted yes but I would modify a little detail...
It would be nice that Mods could turn off members signatures, but not edit them...
I will explain myself:
In that cases you spoke about (users wich uses signature to post porn images and so), it would be nice that Mods could turn off the users signature, I mean, desactivate that signature, but not edit it.
Because, if you say edit, you mean that Mods can enter into the user signature and modify the content...
I would like Mods could desactivate signatures, but not edit its content.
Yes that could be in the settings for the admin to put on or off if you wished.
Why i say edit is down to not all the signatures could have bad text,pic's or other so to edit and place a warning for bad stuff in there sig would be ok.
kirk wrote:I would say yes,
But only if there is a real reason to.
like if it was to big or had a link in it you dint want in there and was not allowed on the forum.
Other then that signatures are supposed to be the members personal expression or something to share with every post, so you have to give them some flexibility to have something that fits them and shows their personality or things their interest..If you were to take that away, then my's well not even allow members to have them., so yes if there was realy something that had to be changed ,edited out, or Spammy, other then that there would be no reason to.
there would have to be a reason for mods to edit the text in the 1st place and i would ask the mods to take a screen shot of the signatures before it was removed so the member can not say it was not true. or maybe add a report in there profiles in the comment part, you cold also have the right to let just one group of mods have the settings
Thank you all for your votes..
~Ape~
14 APE, on 08/04/2011 at 18h18
BUMP
15 Hayley, on 14/04/2011 at 03h10
Yep! 
16 APE, on 14/04/2011 at 19h02
Hayley wrote:Yep!
THANK YOU Haley for your vote
come on guys vote please
and if you say no please say why not ..Thank you
17 middo2, on 26/04/2011 at 00h56
Of course
18 Raizen, on 26/04/2011 at 00h58
Voted Yes
19 APE, on 26/04/2011 at 01h41
middo2 wrote:Of course
Chan wrote:Voted Yes
Thank you for your votes guys
20 TOASTIE, on 27/04/2011 at 15h07
yes , mods are there to help the admin but it seems i have to do everything you should have mods you trust so i cant see it doing any harm
you should have mods you trust so i cant see it doing any harm Similar topics
hey, i was thinkin of this for a couple of days and decided to bring this up
I would like there to be trial mods, Users who have helped out so much and been so nice that they get promoted.
who else thinks this is a good idea?
I created a new group and added members to that group. I selected the sections I wanted that group to moderate but they are unable to ban members. And YES I did go in General>Forum>Security and allow them to ban members but they still say they don't
Hi and I would like to know how to I make it where admins and moderators can read a certain topic in a section but users can't. I made a rule for Admins and Moderators and I would like to know how to make it only for admins and moderators to read but not
Replies 1 to 20 on 78 for "should mods have the right to edit members signature's"
Search
See also
Informations
78 Replies For the topic :
"should mods have the right to edit members signature's"
This topic has been viewed 6222 times.
Last message :
12/03/2011 at 00h05 by "APE"
