Being caught on a camera constitutes implied consent, according to a St. Louis jury

Nucky at 01h30
24
Jul
2010
Being caught on a camera constitutes implied consent, according to a St. Louis jury

I saw this on another forum. There's definitely something going on behind the scenes here. It seems that the majority of courts in the US are corrupt.

http://jezebel.com/5594774/jury-decides-consent-is-not-required-for-girls-gone-wild
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • A highly sensitive person forum. The HSP Dimension. hsp highly sensitive person highly sensitive people Elaine Aron HSP gifted adult introvert intuitive empathic INFJ INFP INTP INTJ ENFP ENFJ ENTJ ENT

  • Numbers of topics : 3035
  • Numbers of messages : 48357
  • Numbers of users : 347
  • Numbers of points : 1798
Similar topics
BBAD had the opportunity to interview Lydia post eviction. What exactly was your strategy going into the house and did it change once you got into the house, if so how did it change? Quote:Into the house was to have people trust me, open up, and
Q.1 What do you mean by free consent? Under what circumstances consent is considered as free? Explain. [10 marks]
Odriod, What camera did you have working? Brand, Model? I tried The gigaware (USA Vendor) that was successfuly hardwired in cheap Eken M001 Tablet and worked with no drivers. It cause camera program to shut down when selected. Thanks
Visit facebook
Now that we have entered the jury phase of BB we will no longer be able to interview the evicted house guests as they are evicted personally. But we are able to submit questions to them which they will answer and send them back to us. Of course they
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

2 Replies For the topic :
"Being caught on a camera constitutes implied consent, according to a St. Louis jury"

This topic has been viewed 147 times.

Last message :
24/07/2010 at 01h30 by "Nucky"