Dimensions Directly Tied to Facts vs. Snowflaking

kbarrett at 01h58
11
Nov
2009
Dimensions Directly Tied to Facts vs. Snowflaking

Hi all,

Thanks in advance for your input on this.
We are in the midst of a building out a portion of our data warehouse. The example here has to do with insurance data. Hopefully the discussion can be abstracted to a more generic modeling level.

We are looking at two options.

Option 1 (see image) joins a dimension directly to the fact table
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence based on dimensional modeling and the Kimball Lifecycle.

  • Numbers of topics : 1858
  • Numbers of messages : 8714
  • Numbers of users : 3801
  • Numbers of points : 1672
Similar topics
Can someone please specify acceptable snowflaking scenarios. - Thanks in advance bi_at_nj
I've got two related questions. Question 1: Building an insurance data warehouse, you have a DimPolicy table (for the insurance policy) and a FactPolicyTransaction table (for the transactions on that policy). There is an insurance agent that is
Given I have 3 tables, Workforce Event Fact, Department Dimension (Type II SCD), and a Department Hierarchy (Type II SCD), and assuming the DEPTIDs in the Department Dimension table are reflected in a BASEDEPTID field in the Dept Dimension hierarchy table
One proposed model for our business (wholesale/retail) sales fact is to have every register ring in one fact. This causes refunds, voids, coupons and other 'facts' to be stored in a single fact entity. There is a column type dimension that then tells us
My company is currently building a data warehouse and I have a design issue that I am not sure how to address. In general, our business is selling an asset, such as the stock of a corporation, with a certain number of shares and a value. The value of th
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

3 Replies For the topic :
"Dimensions Directly Tied to Facts vs. Snowflaking"

This topic has been viewed 1330 times.

Last message :
11/11/2009 at 01h58 by "kbarrett"