Space savings in Star Vs 3NF

Jeff Smith at 19h11
25
Mar
2010
Space savings in Star Vs 3NF

I was curious if anybody had any estimates of the savings in space between a 3NF database and the same Data in a Star Schema? If a 3NF database took up 2.5TB, would the Star be 1.25TB? I was just wondering if there was a rule of thumb about it.

In looking at the big tables in the 3NF, I see a lot of fields that can be grouped together in a junk dimension, plus they are using a lot of Datetime fields that I would replace with the a surrogat
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence based on dimensional modeling and the Kimball Lifecycle.

  • Numbers of topics : 1858
  • Numbers of messages : 8714
  • Numbers of users : 3801
  • Numbers of points : 1672
Similar topics
I got there a little after 7. Nothing had started, but that's fine. Chris greeted me at the door and asked what I wanted him to draw on my hand. He seemed like he'd had a few by this point. Chris Lynch: So, his set was hilarious. After 4 or 5
Can anyone list the advantages and disadvantages of Star vs. Snowflake in your DW environement . And has anyone switched from one to another and why?
I'm designing a data mart for employee compensation. The measures will include things such as salary and various bonuses. Most of the data marts I've designed so far have fallen rather gracefully into a star schema. For this one, however, I have
Here is my first try at ranks, hope you like them! Thanks! Drag~
We hear a lot of BI implementations using star schema. (with few dims snowflaked sometimes ) Why not choose a flat table with all data put together instead of a star schema? (well , this question may seem strange, but please help me out here) Few
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

5 Replies For the topic :
"Space savings in Star Vs 3NF"

This topic has been viewed 1491 times.

Last message :
25/03/2010 at 19h11 by "Jeff Smith"