Junk Dimension Naming

BoxesAndLines at 16h13
16
Sep
2010
Junk Dimension Naming

What do you call your junk dimensions? Do you use "junk" in the dimension name? Junk implies garbage so I don't like using it. Most dimensions are easily named since they represent a single person, place, thing, concept, or event. Junk dimension contents are like a pot luck dinner.
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence based on dimensional modeling and the Kimball Lifecycle.

  • Numbers of topics : 1858
  • Numbers of messages : 8714
  • Numbers of users : 3801
  • Numbers of points : 1672
Similar topics
Hello, I have been following the forum for a while now and I must say that many doubts about dimensional modeling have gone thank to you all. However I am facing now the modeling of a cube and I am somewhat stuck on what is the best
Question about 'Shared' dimensions. I have the following shared dimensions: Dim_Shared_Status & Dim_Shared_StatusType Dim_Shared_Status contains: [Id], [StatusTypeId], [Name] Dim_Shared_StatusType contains: [Id], [Name] Now
I have 30+ fileds that has either 1 or 0 ( true or false)value in a fact table Patid -- -- --- PTInd_1 Ptind_2 Ptind_3........ PTind_30 -- etc 1
Hello, I have a slowly changing dimension table with 105 attributes. About 85% of the attributes are type 1 and the remaining 15% are type 2. I have 4 fields that are type 2 that change a lot more frequently than the rest of the type 2 fields. On a
With an outrigger table, a narrow band of attributes, usually with significantly lower cardinality than the main dimension, is in essence snow flaked off of the main dimension. Great technique for data management and maintenance. To hide complexity from
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

4 Replies For the topic :
"Junk Dimension Naming"

This topic has been viewed 2085 times.

Last message :
16/09/2010 at 16h13 by "BoxesAndLines"