Sandboxie about to be bypassed?

ssj100 at 15h50
06
Jul
2010
Sandboxie about to be bypassed?

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1707945&postcount=77

Finally some negative energy regarding Sandboxie at that forum! His comments confuse me though. I suspect this part of the post is talking about malware that is aware of Sandboxie and therefore will be hidden when executed sandboxed:


Read more
Reply
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Numbers of topics : 437
  • Numbers of messages : 3880
  • Numbers of users : 180
  • Numbers of points : 199
Similar topics
breakout sandboxie 3.46 x64
by google translate ================================== Sandboxie 3.46 to see the official version released in the update statement, sandboxie shamelessly and boastfully claimed that he had the perfect support for the x64-bit operating system, 64-bit
Mis-understandings about Sandboxie
The following is a post as part of a dicussion on Wilders (be careful what you read on Wilders - there is a lot of mis-information there...but I guess most forums suffer from this issue) about running both Sandboxie and Shadow
Small icons in Sandboxie Control
Did you know, add SbieCtrl_SmallIcons=Y to your [UserSettings_Default] or [UserSettings_XXXXXXXX] section to reduce the icons size in Sandboxie Control. Maybe useful if you have many sandboxes.
Sandboxie VS Dell KACE
A challenger appears; Dell kace claims to be a security initiative that gives the users a the opportunity to use a virtualized firefox (that includes flash and adobe reader plugins) that is isolated from the
Shadowdefender/Sandboxie any conflicts?
I know you do not use SD any more ssj100, but was/are there any known conflicts between the two? I think it was version 1.1.0.322 where a conflict was fixed. This just could make my system complete running in shadowmode permanently, only coming out
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

17 Replies For the topic :
"Sandboxie about to be bypassed?"

This topic has been viewed 2651 times.

Last message :
06/07/2010 at 15h50 by "ssj100"