Mis-understandings about Sandboxie

ssj100 at 23h02
24
Apr
2010
Mis-understandings about Sandboxie

The following is a post as part of a dicussion on Wilders (be careful what you read on Wilders - there is a lot of mis-information there...but I guess most forums suffer from this issue) about running both Sandboxie and Shadow Defender:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1665752&postcount=7862

About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Numbers of topics : 437
  • Numbers of messages : 3880
  • Numbers of users : 180
  • Numbers of points : 199
Similar topics
by google translate ================================== Sandboxie 3.46 to see the official version released in the update statement, sandboxie shamelessly and boastfully claimed that he had the perfect support for the x64-bit operating system, 64-bit
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1707945&postcount=77 Finally some negative energy regarding Sandboxie at that forum! His comments confuse me though. I suspect this part of the post is talking about malware that is aware of Sandboxie
Did you know, add SbieCtrl_SmallIcons=Y to your [UserSettings_Default] or [UserSettings_XXXXXXXX] section to reduce the icons size in Sandboxie Control. Maybe useful if you have many sandboxes.
A challenger appears; Dell kace claims to be a security initiative that gives the users a the opportunity to use a virtualized firefox (that includes flash and adobe reader plugins) that is isolated from the
I know you do not use SD any more ssj100, but was/are there any known conflicts between the two? I think it was version 1.1.0.322 where a conflict was fixed. This just could make my system complete running in shadowmode permanently, only coming out
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

3 Replies For the topic :
"Mis-understandings about Sandboxie"

This topic has been viewed 571 times.

Last message :
24/04/2010 at 23h02 by "ssj100"